tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7703913.post116060019832683232..comments2023-10-02T04:41:34.722-04:00Comments on Marry in Massachusetts: Mad Dad Doomed in His Fantasiesmassmarrierhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02358207247771711952noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7703913.post-1160815523370243062006-10-14T04:45:00.000-04:002006-10-14T04:45:00.000-04:00They were worried about having their names attache...<I> They were worried about having their names attached to instituting bigotry and therefore fought any prejudices they may have had in coming to the right decision.</I><BR/><BR/><BR/>Alas, there were not enough high court justices in Washington and New York states who had the same worry. Nice job, folks--you've just signed on to your generation's <I>Plessy v. Ferguson</I> (the case that enshrined the "separate but equal" doctrine). Your grandchildren will rue the day you did.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7703913.post-1160619384441947752006-10-11T22:16:00.000-04:002006-10-11T22:16:00.000-04:00"Far more dubious claims that showing the existenc..."Far more dubious claims that showing the existence of legally married homosexual couples in a non-sexual context violates religious rights."<BR/><BR/>Wow, I must have missed that commandment: <I>though shall not show pictures of men touching men</I>. <BR/><BR/>What a load of bull. It amazes me at how much harm parents want to put their kids through: instead of showing them that there are different ways that people live as they're young, they apparently want their kids to be shocked, angry and abusive when they're older. It's kind of like the opposite of all those state congressmen who basically said, when the gay marriage amendment was up for debate the first time years ago, that 'I may not agree with gay marriage, but I don't want my name attached to such a document because I'd be embarrassed for my kids.' They were worried about having their names attached to instituting bigotry and therefore fought any prejudices they may have had in coming to the right decision. I give those guys and women some serious respect for putting their prejudices behind them. <BR/><BR/>This guy bringing up the suit? He gets nothing but derision.Ryanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04523572927796479670noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7703913.post-1160605381251954832006-10-11T18:23:00.000-04:002006-10-11T18:23:00.000-04:00I was saturated with hetero sex by stories told us...I was saturated with hetero sex by stories told us in elementary school. for example, there is kissing between princesses and frogs (bestiality! but still hetero as it was a man frog). and how about the little old woman in the shoe? you mean to tell me she got that mess o'sons from divine intervention? SEX! she had SEX many, many times (count the boys). so what the f*ck is wrong with a story, somewhere, at some point in time, implying that sex may happen between two men or two women?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com