tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7703913.post7007594673762901019..comments2023-10-02T04:41:34.722-04:00Comments on Marry in Massachusetts: What Right to Incite?massmarrierhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02358207247771711952noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7703913.post-31137538871167218382008-04-10T17:23:00.000-04:002008-04-10T17:23:00.000-04:00I'm neither sure the last comment is true, just un...I'm neither sure the last comment is true, just untested. Also, the civil side is a whole other matter. Finally, I'll be fascinated to see what else shakes loose on the informant issue. He's pushed the boundaries of both kinds of law for years. It remains to be seen if there are consequences, other than being widely reviled.massmarrierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02358207247771711952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7703913.post-28586082158296268182008-04-10T15:45:00.000-04:002008-04-10T15:45:00.000-04:00The reason Hal Turner has never been arrested for ...The reason Hal Turner has never been arrested for what he says rests in two separate US Supreme Court decisions which Turner has often cited.<BR/><BR/>1) Brandenberg v. Ohio<BR/>You can view the very short explanation of this case at http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_492/<BR/><BR/>Basically, anyone say call for any criminal act as long as they do so "in a context which does not lend itself to IMMINENT lawlessness. A talk radio show does not lend itself to IMMINENT lawlessness.<BR/><BR/>2) Virginia v. Black<BR/>You can view the very short description of this case at:<BR/>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_01_1107/<BR/><BR/>This case deals with "intimidation" of people and protects certain "acts" even though they may seem to be intimidation.<BR/><BR/>Turner doesn;t get arrested because under existing case law, he has not broken any laws.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com